by StepChange Innovations GmbH
Login Status
You are not logged in.
Receive abstracts of new posts by e-mail
* = required field
Sponsored Ads

Slow progress in the Greenpeace detox campaign

Zero discharge – Latest on the detox campaign

In an unprecedented endeavor, big apparel and fashion brands initiated the zero discharge of hazardous chemicals (ZDHCs ) programme, inspired by the Greenpeace “detox campaign”. The programme may possibly set a new standard of environmental performance for the global apparel and footwear industry, if implemented seriously.

The detox campaign started in 2011 when Greenpeace investigated the environmental conditions at major Chinese textile players Youngor and Well Dyeing[i], big suppliers for the world´s most famous textile brands (see reports “Dirty laundry”[ii] and later “Dirty laundry reloaded”[iii]).

The pressure started to build up. Soon thereafter, at the end of 2011, the founding members C&A, H&N, adidas, Li-Ning and Puma published a joint roadmap to remove toxic chemicals from the textile supply chain by the year 2020[iv].

In 2012 additional global brands, namely G-Star, Levis[v] , Jack Wolfskin and Marks & Spencer[vi] have joined the project as well. Meanwhile, with so many of the world´s biggest brands already on board, the project is almost a must join for the big brands.

To read the full article, please login. The full content of this article and all premium articles is available exclusively for site members.
Site membership is free. If you are an existing user, please login. New users may register below.

Existing Users Log In
 Remember Me  
New User Registration
*Required field
  • a.

    just started reading about this issue, freaked out because i just today put on a brand-new pair of hanes underwear (sorry for TMI! :-) so i checked their website and found they have a “chemical management” program that sounds pretty decent – hanes brands is publicly traded, so for them to be doing it means it has got to work with their bottom line. perhaps it could be a model for these other companies? i’m not in this industry so i don’t know if their restricted substances list (which is not actually included on the site) is extensive enough. but they say elsewhere that they basically match or exceed US regulations wherever they operate, which hopefully is a good thing, and a model for other companies.

  • This is really fascinating, You are an excessively professional blogger. I have joined your rss feed and look ahead to in search of more of your fantastic post. Also, I have shared your website in my social networks

  • Pingback: These are the nasty chemicals that Greenpeace found in a huge range of children’s clothing – Quartz()

Sponsored Ads
Recent Tweets

Follow Me on Twitter

November 2012
« Oct   Dec »

Copyright © 2013. All Rights Reserved.